They are good because His character is good. I believe people are more than just Turing machines, which need the right code philosophy in order to be good. In the next section, Kai Nielsen challenges the truth of these claims, as well as the overall plausibility of Divine Diivine command theory Theory.
The truth of A—at least important parts—has been established, scientifically. Speech acts can entail obligations, as we have seen with respect to the institution of promise making.
I rate him, and think his slavery chapters are a great rebuttal to Copan and Glenn. However, if there is a God and an afterlife where the righteous are rewarded with happiness and justice obtains, this problem goes away. God commands that p. You say there was a better way, and yet have not given sound reason to think that this is so.
The Canaanites were wicked and rebellious and under the just condemnation of God for their sin. However, in such disputes, Boylan argues that when the commands of religion or the values of aesthetics clash with the demands of morality, in a just society morality should win the day.
Hence, that God cannot do immoral actions is not a limit on his power, but rather it is entailed by his omnipotence. The Euthyphro Dilemma The dialogue between Socrates and Euthyphro is nearly omnipresent in philosophical discussions of the relationship between God and ethics.
Inventing Right and Wrong. An Inquiry into Divine Attributes. It is not a truth-seeking behavior. You think that all the Israelites needed was better commands.
Criticism Begging the Question Divine command theory cannot prove that God is the source of morality because that is precisely what it assumes. God does not consult some independent Platonic realm where the objective principles of goodness exist, but rather God just acts according to his necessarily good character.
This is a point which Stark makes, and which seems pertinently obvious to me, and so it frustrates the hell out of me when apologists including yourself here opt for the charitable approach at the expense of even acknowledging the continued existence of the worst types of slavery.
Rights and Wrongs which argues that will is largely irrelevant. For they preach, but do not practice. We must believe that there is a God who will help us satisfy the demands of the moral law. The same point holds for moral propositions like "inflicting unnecessary suffering solely for fun is wrong.
To purchase related reading, go to the Secular Web Book Store. Slavery and why it was not obviously outlawed needs explaining. God and the Basis of Morality. This perspective assumes that objective moral properties exist, which is of course highly controversial.
He used the example of water not having an identical meaning to H2O to propose that "being commanded by God" does not have an identical meaning to "being obligatory".Divine command theory suggests that any statement about ethics is actually a statement about the attitudes and desires of God.
That is, it claims that God's commands and morality are identical. To suggest that morality can exist without God is therefore a contradiction. Contents.
The alternative to Divine Command Theory is the assertion that the basis for morality lies outside of God, rather than at the mercy of His whim. This is the approach that Plato takes in his dialogue Euthyphro.
The divine command theory (DCT) of ethics holds that an act is either moral or immoral solely because God either commands us to do it or prohibits us from doing it, respectively. On DCT the only thing that makes an act morally wrong is that God prohibits doing it, and all that it means to say that.
Divine command theory (also known as theological voluntarism) is a meta-ethical theory which proposes that an action's status as morally good is equivalent to whether it is commanded by God.
The theory asserts that what is moral is determined by what God commands, and that for a person to be moral is to follow his commands. 1 Divine Command Theory 1. Divine Command Theory: This is the view that rightness stems from God’s commands: That is, an action is right if God commands it, and wrong if He forbids it.
On this view, morality is dependent on God. Divine command theory is an ethical view based on theism or the belief that God exists. Followers of the theory accept that all moral judgment is derived from an understanding of God's character or his direct commandments.Download